WEARABLE-AI SCIENCE & EVIDENCE

Evidence built for real-world Wearable-AI.

Longitudinal wearables, CGM, clinical biomarkers and biochemical ground truth feed a cardiometabolic knowledge base—then NeuTigers translates that intelligence into compact, privacy-preserving models for on-device deployment.

Request an evidence review

Figures and claims are reproduced from the supplied 2026 project source and remain subject to source verification, publication linkage, permissions, and medical, regulatory and legal review before public launch.

RESEARCH FAQ

Questions the evidence answers.

Direct answers drawn from the studies on this page. Investigational research; not a cleared medical device.

How accurate is smartwatch-based diabetes risk screening in studies?

In NeuTigers’ prospective SweetDeep-Watch study (285 participants across the EU, US and MENA, seven days of free-living data on Samsung Galaxy Watch), the investigational model reached 82.5% patient-level accuracy against biochemical ground truth, with 82.1% macro-F1, 79.7% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity and a 5.5% expected calibration error. Allowing the model to abstain on fewer than 10% of low-confidence cases raised accuracy to 84.5%. This is investigational research, not a cleared medical device.

How does wearable-AI screening compare with the FINDRISC questionnaire?

In a patient-level comparison on the same population, the investigational SweetDeep-Watch model outperformed the standard FINDRISC questionnaire on every reported metric: accuracy 84.5% vs 68.8% (+15.7 points), specificity 85.2% vs 66.9% (+18.3 points), sensitivity 81.3% vs 78.1% (+3.2 points), negative predictive value 95.8% vs 93.9%, and AUROC 89.6% vs 84.7%.

Can CGM data alone signal type 2 diabetes risk?

In NeuTigers’ SweetDeep-CGM study, a 13,000-parameter convolutional neural network trained on raw 24-hour CGM traces from 551 participants (304,000 overlapping windows, no standardized meal or medication restrictions) classified type 2 diabetes vs non-diabetes with 90.2% accuracy, 95.1% AUROC, 87.6% macro-F1 and a 3.5% calibration error, with external validation across France + Algeria and United States cohorts. Investigational research.

What signals does the wearable model use?

Daily two-minute recordings of ECG, PPG/blood pressure and bioelectrical impedance (BIA), combined with age, family history and time-of-day. The model has fewer than 3,000 parameters, runs on-device (Edge-AI), aggregates predictions at patient level and abstains when confidence is low.

Is SweetDeep FDA cleared?

No. The planned initial consumer experience is positioned as general wellness, which FDA does not review, and it is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease. The screening capability described on this page is investigational; NeuTigers is evaluating De Novo and 510(k) routes for regulated B2B uses.

What is the KB-PCMHD cardiometabolic knowledge base?

A research knowledge base of roughly 2,000 study participants across the US, EU and MENA that links, at participant level, watch-sensor physiology, CGM glucose dynamics, cardiometabolic biomarkers, biochemical reference tests (FPG, HbA1c, OGTT) and outcomes. It serves as the substrate for developing and validating new models.

Where is the research published?

The SweetDeep study, “SweetDeep: A Wearable AI Solution for Real-Time Non-Invasive Diabetes Screening”, is available as a preprint on arXiv (2512.03471). First pages and abstracts are reproduced in the publications section above.

QUALIFIED DILIGENCE

Review the methods behind the research.

Request technical documentation